Behind the scene judge's conspiracies/blacklisting of claimants
by Farzana - written 09/03/2010 14:21:33
I have just discovered your website. For a number of years I have found that no matter what legal case I have, ie whether civil or criminal, they have been consistently declined. Apart from my first case all the others seem to show evidence of "behind the scene" conspiracies. I feel there may be hidden defamatory or false blacklisting of me due to my strong evidences and announcement of corruption within the judiciary and judicial processes.
My second employment case was a total fraud carried out by the employment tribunals. I believe from then on those particulars judges will have tried to take measures to cover their act and influence my further cases from being free from their fraud style culture.
Recently I went to a police branch to report fraud by a fraudster and I was completely shocked by the treatment I got from the receptionist then repeatedly by two more staff she called to the scene. I barely got through six sentences before the sergeant(who the receptionist called away from patrol duty rather than approach someone from within the building) shouted ferociously that he would arrest me and if I didn't shut up he would arrange for officers to escort me out of the building. Shocked into silence, and before I left the building, I asked one more time, "So you don't want to know about the money/ asset laundering of this individual?" He shouted, "No!". I came home to complain to the main switchboard staff. They assigned an inspector to address my complaints.
The Inspector rang 10.30pm at night the same day. He too started being evasive of the original fraud complaint and tried to avoid the meaning/implications of the behaviour of the sergeant. He assured me he logged my request for full investigation which their professional standards' department would carry out. When I received my first acknowledgement letter from the prof.std dept, I was horrified to see on a small printout of what description the inspector logged about the case, that it was so different to what I said, so I complained about him too.
The Professional Std's Dept invited me to take my statement some two month's later. During this meeting I asked to see what the inspector had written about me but they refused. They also refused to give me a copy of my signed statement which had been somewhat coerced into the words they wanted to read rather than the strong words I would have used. However at that stage I never imaged I would need to go legal with the case so I did not insist on stronger words.
They promised me they would send my report within 28days. But the 28 days went by and another 4 months went by but no reports showed up, only excuses that the delays were justified. The wording on their letters got me suspicious of their reasons so I lodged my case as I believed they might not do anything if I missed the 6 month county court deadlines.
They finally sent their report just as the six months were up but by then I had already lodged my case with the county court. It claimed they could not access CCTV footage (not a surprise given that it would reveal their faults). The report was compiled on a third party of a third party of a third party speech basis of English language. In order words they did not have the direct words to quote from signed written statements of the offending individuals which they were meant to have taken. They also refused to send me all the documentary evidences I requested eg telephone bills, notes of the Inspector which would eliminate all their lies.
But soon, just like my previous cases I have been finding that many irregularities within the court procedures have begun and they are giving them favours. A court that rules in their favour will be knowingly allow all the corrupt and unfair procedures including a failure to log the fraud complaint I had and then the incomplete investigation and the Manipulation of evidence.
Please advise what HELP can I get for preventing such hidden conspiracies against me. The police authority separately hired a private legal firm to defend their case instead of their in-house legal department dealing with it. This seems to me to be another one of their fraudulent agendas ie to charge my property with costs as a form of retaliation rather than address their corruption.. All they have to do now is to assign one of their judges to sit in on the hearing.
From Ms Haque.
RETURN TO INFORMATIONLAW.ORG.UK