RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Caleb
by David Silversides - written 10/09/2010 20:39:42
What 'generally accepted definition of a human being'. If it is so generally accepted, you should have no difficulty telling me what it is and should feel no need for abusive language. No cop-out involved, just a rather basic question.
Lew wrote (05/09/2010 18:41:39):
I'm sorry but your ignorance is cringeworthy and the more you protest along this pathetic, side step, cop-out of a line the more of a fool you look.
There were substantive questions raised regarding the substantive issues upon which you choose to campaign. If you cannot defend the position from which you campaign then you simply shouldn't be campaigning.
"What is a man?" Come off it. We're talking social, political and legal positions here by which the generally accepted definition of a human being works quite well. Those are the parameters within which we're working here.
Enough of your special pleading please. It's ludicrous.
Reply
|
BACK
|
RETURN TO CALEBFOUNDATION.ORG
|