Dear David of the Caleb Foundation,

I actually have grasped your position, further up in this same thread, and I've responded to you on those terms, and showed why it is your thinking which is flawed here.

I've raised a number of other points too, which you seem to have chosen to simply ignore.

Would you care to address them? You gave me a "brief response" before, and I was expecting something with more meat on it, and you've come back with a couple of snipes even more brief than the brief response.

Yours,

Lew



Lew - you still don't seem to have grasped the main point which is that, having ruled out Divine revelation, you don't know what a human being is and whether his reason is of value or not. You want it to be and therefore assume it to be. Man cannot independently define man without wishful thinking. You use the term 'nonsense' but apart from God, there is no sense, so there cannot be nonesnse to contrast with it.